Date: |
23-01-1996
|
Notification No: |
Central Excise Circular No 169/1996
|
Issuing Authority: |
Central Excise
|
Type: |
Circular
|
File No: |
|
Subject: |
Procedure regarding refunds claimed under Notification No. 64/93-Central Excise, as amended, by car manufacturers
|
Procedure regarding refunds claimed under Notification No. 64/93-Central
Excise, as amended, by car manufacturers
Circular
No. 169
dated 23rd January 1996
I
am directed to refer to Notification No. 64/93-CE, dated 28.02.93, as amended,
in terms of which saloon cars, used as taxis are effectively charged excise duty
@ 30% ad valorem. Since it is not certain, at the time of clearance of a saloon
car from the factory of manufacture, whether it would be used as a taxi, or
otherwise, a provision has been made in the notification for allowing a refund
of an amount equivalent to the excise duty of ten percentage points to the
manufacturer of such saloon cars. In others, the intention of the notification
is that the TAXI OWNER should effectively bear a duty burden of 30% ad
valorem and not 40% ad valorem.
2.
In this context it has been represented to the Board that the taxi owners
generally purchase the saloon cars from the dealers and rarely from the
manufacturers, directly. Thus, to settle the refund claims, the concerned excise
officers insist on proof of encashment of cheques issued by the manufacturers to
persons, in whose names and saloon cars are registered as taxis. This involves
cumbersome correspondence, resulting in delays in settling refund claims.
Accordingly, the Board is of the view that having regard to the intention behind
the exemption Notification, it would suffice that conditions under Notification
No. 64/93-CE are deemed to be fulfilled, if the details of registration and
proof of payment of differential duty to the customer (whether directly by the
manufacturer or through the dealer) are produced in support of refund claims.
3.
The pending claims may kindly be settled in the above instructions.
|
|