Customer Service - Reversal of Erroneous Debits Arising on Fraudulent or
Other Transactions
DBOD.LEG.BC.86/
09.07.007/ 2001 - 02 dated 8th April 2002
Please
refer to our circular DBOD.BP.BC. 57/21.01.001/95 dated May 4, 1995 (copy
enclosed) advising banks to adhere to the guidelines and procedure for opening
and operating deposit accounts to safeguard against unscrupulous persons opening
accounts mainly to use them as conduit for fraudulently encashment payment
instruments. However, we continue to receive complaints of fraudulent encashment
by unscrupulous persons opening deposit accounts in the name/s similar to
already established concern/s resulting in erroneous and unwanted debit of
drawers' accounts. Banks are, therefore, advised to remain vigilant to avoid
such lapses and to issue necessary instructions to the branches/ staff.
2.
Besides, in cases of the above kind, the banks have also not restored
funds promptly to customers even in bona-fide cases but deferred action till
completion of either departmental action or police interrogation. In this
connection we invite a reference to our circular DBOD.No.Com.BC.18/C.408A-78
dated February 15, 1978 (copy enclosed) in terms of which the banks were advised
that once the bank is convinced that an irregularity/ fraud had been committed
by its staff towards any constituent, it should at once acknowledge its
liability and pay the just claim.
3.
With a view to redressing the grievances of the customers in this regard,
we have reviewed the position and advise that (i) in cases where banks are at
fault, the banks should compensate customers without demur, and (ii) in cases
where neither the bank is at fault nor the customer at fault but the fault lies
elsewhere in the system, then also the banks should compensate the customers
(upto a limit) as part of a Board approved customer relations policy.
4.
Please acknowledge the receipt.
Ref.
DBOD.No.COM.BC.18/C.408A-78 dated 15th February 1978
FRAUDS
IN BANKS
Recently,
it came to our notice that a person committed a fraud by making certain material
alterations viz. changing the name of the payee and overwriting the amount and
date of the cheque on a bank (paying bank). The person got the amount of the
altered cheque credited to his account with a third bank (collecting bank) and
withdrew the money later. The account holder who thus lost the money took the
matter to court, which held that there was total negligence on the part of both
the banks i.e. the collecting bank and the paying bank. In its judgement, the
court observed that once a bank was convinced that an irregularity/ fraud had
been committed by its staff towards any constituent, it should at once,
acknowledge its liability and pay the just claim, thereby setting an example for
fair dealing with the general public, and not resort to unnecessary litigation.
We commend these observations of the High Court to the banks for implementation.
BP.BC.57/
21.01.001/95
Ref.DBOD.BP.BC.57/
21.01.001/95, dated 4th May 1995 (19950504)
FRAUDS
IN BANKS - MONITORING OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS SEC. BANKING POLICY
Please
refer to our circulars DBOD.No.GC.BC.193/ 17.04.001/ 93 dated November 18, 1993
and BP.BC.106/ 21.01.001/ 94 dated September 23, 1994 wherein we have reiterated
the need for banks strictly adhering to the guidelines and procedures for
opening and operating deposit accounts to safeguard against unscrupulous persons
opening `benami' (fictitious) accounts mainly to use them as conduit for
fraudulently encashing third party cheques, drafts, etc. As a further measure to
safeguard against misuse of bank accounts, banks were advised (vide our circular
letter DBOD.No.GC.202/ 17.04.001/ 93 dated December 6, 1993) to obtain
photographs of depositors and account holders who are authorized to operate the
accounts in respect of new deposit accounts opened with effect from January 1,
1994. Banks were also advised to forewarn their branches that the violation of
essential safeguards and laid down procedures in opening and operations of
deposit accounts by the branch officials would attract punitive action against
them.
2.
We observe that, despite out repeated instructions in the matter,
instances of opening of fictitious accounts and fraudulent encashment of third
party/ account payee cheques, interest/ dividend warrants, refund orders, etc.
are being reported to us as also to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
Such accounts are generally closed within a short period after siphoning off the
money by the unscrupulous persons.
In order, therefore, to further tighten the
monitoring system relating to opening and operations in deposit and other
accounts, banks should take further steps as indicated below:
(a)
A system of close watch on new deposit accounts should be introduced. The
banks should advise their branches that although it will be the primary
responsibility of the In-Charges of the deposit accounts section/ departments to
monitor such newly opened accounts, the branch managers or the managers of
deposit accounts section at the branch will, at least, for the first three
months keep a close watch so as to guard against any fraudulent or doubtful
transactions taking place therein. It should be made clear to them that they
will be held personally accountable in case it transpires subsequently that
these accounts have been used during the initial period of three months for
fraudulent transactions.
(b)
A system of close monitoring of cash withdrawals for large amounts should
be put in place. It has been observed that third party cheques, drafts etc. are
deposited in the existing and newly opened accounts followed by cash withdrawals
for large amounts thereby giving rise to suspicion about the nature of the whole
transaction. In our circular DBOD.No.FMC.BC.153/ 27.01.003/ 93-94 dated
September 1, 1993, it has been mentioned that the branch managers should closely
monitor cash withdrawals for large amounts. We advise that bank should introduce
a system of closely monitoring cash deposits and withdrawals for Rs.10 lakhs and
above not only in deposit accounts but also in all other accounts like cash
credit/ overdraft etc. The branches should also maintain a separate register to
record details of individual cash deposits and withdrawals for Rs.10 lakhs and
above. The details recorded should include, in the case of deposits, the name of
the account holder, account number, amount deposited and in the case of
withdrawals, the name of the account holder, account number, amount of
withdrawal and name of the beneficiary of the cheque.
3.
Please acknowledge receipt and confirm having noted these instructions
for strict compliance.
|