Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise & Custom
Circular No. 1014/2/2016-CX
New Delhi, dated the 01st February, 2016
To
Principal Chief Commissioner/ Chief Commissioner / Principal Commissioner of
Central Excise and Customs (All)
Web-master, CBEC
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Inclusion of show cause notice’s issued in relation to levy
of CVD on vessels imported for breaking in the "Call-Book"-reg.
References have been received in the Board from trade and field formations in
relation to Judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat passed in SCA No. 10607
of 1995 filed by M/s Shivam Engineering Company and others reported as
[2014-TIOL-1563-HC-AHM-CUS]. A SLP has been filed by the department in Hon’ble
Supreme Court against this order.
- In the said judgement, Hon’ble High Court has held that duty under
Central Excise
Act, 1944 can be levied, if the article has come into existence as a result
of production
or manufacture. Articles which are not produced or manufactured cannot be
subjected
to levy of excise duty. On the import of like article, no additional duty
can be levied
under section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Since the vessels and
other
floating structures for ‘breaking-up’ are not manufactured in India, no
excise duty is
leviable and consequently no additional duty under Section 3(1) of the
Customs Tariff
Act, 1985 can be levied on import of such goods. The reason for such
conclusion by
Hon’ble High Court is that when articles which are not produced or
manufactured
cannot be subjected to levy of excise duty, then on the import of like
articles no
additional duty can be levied under the Customs Tariff Act.
- In view of above said judgement, trade are following two different
practices as
enumerated below and are being issued Show cause Notices according to the
practice
they follow:-.
(w Cause Notices have been issued to importers who are not paying CVD
demanding CVD from them as department has appealed against the order of the
Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat.
(ii) Show Cause Notices for wrong vailment of CENVAT credit have been
issued to
those importers who are paying CVD voluntarily and taking CENVAT credit and
utilising the same for payment of Central Excise duty liability arising due
to breaking
of vessels.
- The problem faced by the trade due to issue of Show Cause Notices in
either
situation has been examined in Board and it has been decided that all Show
Cause
Notices issued for non-payment of CVD [refer para3(i) above] shall be kept
in call
book till the SLP filed by the department in the Hon’ble Supreme Court is
decided.
- Show Cause Notice denying Cenvat Credit of CVD paid voluntarily by the
importers at the time of import is not warranted. It is well settled
position in law that a
buyer may avail Cenvat Credit, if supplier has paid duty. In this regard
following case
law may be referred- CCE vs. CEGAT2006 (202) ELT 753(Mad HC DB), CCE vs
Ranbaxy Labs Ltd. [2006(203) ELT 213(P&H HC DB)], Commissioner of Central
Excise, Chennai-I vs CEGAT, Chennai reported as [2006(202)ELT.753(MAD.)].
Credit is accordingly admissible for duty paid voluntarily.
- Thus, once the importer has paid CVD on import of ship, Cenvat Credit of
that
CVD cannot be denied for payment of Central Excise duty on breaking of that
ship.
Show Cause Notices already issued for denying Cenvat Credit may be decided
in light
of these instructions and in future such Show Cause Notices may not be
issued.
- Also vide Notification No. 1/2016- Central Excise(N.T.), dated 01.02.2016
in the
CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, in rule 3, in sub-rule (1), in clause (vii), the
proviso has
been omitted.
- Proviso to rule 3(1)(vii) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was inserted vide
Notification No. 03/2011-Central Excise(NT), dated 1.3.2011. In the breaking
of ships,
products of section XV(base metals and articles of base metal) are obtained
which are
deemed to be manufactured as provided in section note 9 of Section XV of the
First
Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.On the other hand, a number
of used
serviceable articles such as pumps, air conditioners, furniture, kitchen
equipment,
wooden panels etc. are also generated. These are generally sold as second
hand goods
by ship breaking units but no excise duty is payable as they do not emerge
from a
manufacturing process. At the same time, ship breaking units are allowed to
avail full
credit of additional duty of customs paid on the ship when it is imported
for breaking.
This anThis anomaly was resulting in excess utilization of CENVAT credit. Rule 3 of
the
CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was accordingly amended to prescribe that Cenvat
credit
shall not be allowed in excess of 85% of the additional duty of customs paid
on ships,
boats etc. imported for breaking.
- Further, amendment in Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was carried out
in
budget of 2015, to provide that now credit is required to be reversed even
for nonexcisable
goods produced as byproducts in the process of manufacture of excisable
goods. This amendment has brought non-excisable goods and exempt goods at
par and
no credit is now available on either of them. The explanation inserted in
Rule 6 is as
follows:-
Explanation1- For th- For the purpose of this rule, exempted goods or final products
as
defined in clause (d) and (h) of rule 2 shall include non-excisable goods
cleared for a
consideration from the factory.
- At present there is a conflict regarding reversal of credit in relation
to nonexcisable
goods which emerge during breaking of ship viz. whether
restriction/reversal of credit needs to be done under proviso to rule 3(i)(vii)
of
CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 or under rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. To
resolve the conflict, the provision restricting CENVAT credit to 85% under
proviso to
rule 3 (i)(vii) of Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004 has been deleted. Consequently
ship
breaking units would be entitled to avail 100% credit of the CVD paid with
effect
from 01.03.2015 but would also be required to follow provisions of rule 6 of
CENVAT
Credit Rules, 2004 with effect from 01.03.2015. This beneficial amendment of
deleting proviso to rule 3(i)(vii) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has been
done
retrospectively with effect from 01.03.2015, that is the date from which
reversal of
Cenvat Credit for non-excisable goods was provided in rule 6 of Cenvat
Credit Rules,
2004.
- Difficulties faced, if any, in implementation of this Circular may be
brought to the
notice of the Board. Hindi version follows.
Yours faithfully(Santosh Kumar Mishra)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
F. No. 6/14/2014-CX.I (Pt.)
|