Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Excise & Customs)
New Delhi dated the 18th May 2010.
Circular No. 922/12/ 2010-CX
Subject: Power of adjudication of Central Excise Officers- instructions - reg.
Please refer to Circular No.
752/68/2003-CX dated 01.10.’03 amended by
Circular
No. 865/3/2008-CX dated 19th February 2008 on the above subject. At present
adjudication powers in Central Excise cases have been delegated upto the level
of Assistant Commissioners only, and Superintendents are not vested with any
authority to adjudicate cases. The Board has decided to confer the power of
adjudication on Superintendents for cases involving duty upto Rs. 1 Lakh in a
show cause notice, except in respect of issues involving rate of duty and
valuation or where extended period of limitation has been involved. Accordingly,
under the provisions of Section 11A and 33 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the
following further amendments are made to the Circular 752/68/2003-CX dated 1st
October 2003, as amended.
I. In Part B of para 2.1 of the Circular, the following row shall be inserted:.
| Central Excise Officers |
Power of adjudication
(Amount of duty involved) |
| Superintendents |
Upto Rs. 1 Lakh
(excluding cases involving determination of rate of duty
or valuation and cases
involving extended period of limitation) |
II. Consequently, the monetary limits of adjudication for the Assistant
Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner would stand revised/amended in the said tables
as follows:
| Central Excise Officers |
Power of adjudication
(Amount of duty involved) |
| Deputy/Assistant Commissioners |
Upto Rs. 5 Lakh
(except the cases where Superintendents are empowered to
adjudicate). |
III. After Para 4 of the said Circular, a new Para 4A shall be inserted as given
below:
“4A Regarding the power of adjudication of cases given to Superintendents, the
following aspects are clarified:
I. They would be eligible to decide cases involving duty and/or CENVAT credit
upto Rs. 1 Lakh in individual SCNs.
II. They would not be eligible to decide cases which involve excisability of a
product, classification, eligibility of exemption, valuation and cases involving
suppression of facts, fraud etc..
III. They would be eligible to decide cases involving wrong availment of CENVAT
credit upto a monetary limit of upto Rs. 1 Lakh.
IV. They would be eligible to decide Show Cause Notice proposing only imposition
of penalty under Rule 26 and 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 or Rule 15 and
15A of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.”
2. The jurisdictional Commissioners of Central Excise may redistribute the
pending cases in the Commissionerate based on the above factors. It is further
clarified that notwithstanding this revision, in all cases, where the personal
hearing has already been completed, orders will be passed by the officer before
whom the hearing has been held. Such orders should normally be issued within a
month of the date of completion of the personal hearing.
3. It may also be noted that the age-wise pendency of cases as shown in MTR
would be reflected based on the date of issuance of Show Cause Notice, and not
on the basis of transfer of cases to the new Adjudicating Authority. The
jurisdictional Commissioners should ensure that the work regarding re-allocation
of pending cases, issuance of corrigendum to the Show Cause Notices, transfer of
relevant files and records, etc., should be completed within a month. A
compliance report in this regard should be sent by the Commissioner to the zonal
Chief Commissioner, who in turn, should submit a report to the Board by
1.6.2010, certifying that all the work regarding re-allocation of cases has been
completed.
4. Field formations and trade may be informed suitably.
5. Receipt of the Circular may please be acknowledged.
6. Hindi version will follow.
( Sushil Solanki )
Commissioner (CX)
F.No. 208/2/2009-CX-6