Date: |
30-11-2000
|
Notification No: |
Central Excise Circular No 559/2000
|
Issuing Authority: |
Central Excise
|
Type: |
Circular
|
File No: |
|
Subject: |
Regarding CA No. 5832 of 1999 - In the matter of CCE, Meerut vs. M/s. Surya Roshni Ltd. - inclusion or otherwise of transit risk insurance for the purpose of determination of assessable value of bulbs and tubes - Question
|
Regarding CA No. 5832 of 1999 - In the matter of CCE, Meerut vs. M/s.
Surya Roshni Ltd. - inclusion or otherwise of transit risk insurance for the
purpose of determination of assessable value of bulbs and tubes - Question
Circular
No. 559 dated 30th November 2000
M/s.
Surya Roshni Ltd. situated in jurisdiction of CCE, Meerut-II is engaged in the
manufacture of electric bulbs and tubes. The bulbs and tubes are sold FOR
Destination. The price charged includes 2% towards transit risk insurance. For
the purpose of the determination of the assessable value of bulbs and tubes, the
assessee claimed a deduction on account of equalized freight based on the
aggregate of transportation charges, insurance charges, octroi and taxes.
On
examination, it came to the notice of the department that the deduction on
account of the insurance charges was actually on account of "transit
losses/ breakages replenished to customers". The deduction on this account
claimed by the assessee was disallowed by the assessing authority. However, the
Tribunal held that transit insurance was eligible for deduction while
determining assessable value and allowed the party's appeal.
The
Apex Court while allowing the C.A. filed by the department vide their order
dated 13.09.2000 in the above mentioned matter reported in 2000 (122) ELT 3 (SC)
held that the payment made by the assessee to its customers for breakages and
losses cannot tantamount to insurance. Nor can, by any means, such compensation
be treated as part of the cost of transportation; it is a clear case of making
up to the customer by means of a credit note, the moneys that it has lost on
account of breakages or losses in transit.
You
are requested to clarify the matter to the lower field formations and ensure
that all officers keep the aforesaid judgement in mind, when deciding other
disputes of similar nature.
|
|