| Date: |
15-11-1996
|
| Notification No: |
Central Excise Circular No 269/1996
|
| Issuing Authority: |
Central Excise
|
| Type: |
Circular
|
| File No: |
|
| Subject: |
Resolving of disputes between Public Sector Undertakings & the Govt. Departments
|
|
Resolving of disputes between Public Sector Undertakings & the Govt.
Departments
Circular
No. 269
dated 15th November 1996
A
case has come to the notice of the Board wherein a Commissioner of Central
Excise held mutual discussion with a Public Sector Undertaking and decided the
case in favour of the Public Sector Undertaking. The decision of Committee on
Disputes (COD) was that the Public Sector Undertaking should resolve the matter
through mutual discussion with the Department of Revenue (CBEC) and to come back
to the Committee in the event of matter being not resolved.
2.
In this regard attention is invited to the Board's instructions issued
under F.No. 390/85/93-JC dated 10.2.94 wherein it was stated that the Public
Sector under taking should first try to resolve the disputes through discussion
with the Chief Commissioners. These instructions on where authorise the
Commissioners to resolve the disputes after mutual discussion with Public sector
Undertaking. Even in cases the mutual discussion takes place between the Chief
Commissioner and Public sector Undertaking, a decision for pursuing or not
pursuing the appeal in the Tribunal or Courts is to be taken by the Committee on
Disputes and not be the Chief Commissioner. There is no authority under the law
to Commissioner/ Chief Commissioner to modify an existing order passed by the
competent adjudicating authority/ appellate Authority. This can only be done by
CEGAT/ Courts after the permission to pursue the matter is given by Committee on
Disputes.
3.
The Board has taken serious view of this matter. It is again desired that
whenever committee on disputes has directed to resolve the dispute after mutual
discussion with a Public Sector Under taking, such discussions have to take
place at the Board's level and not at the level of Commissioner/ Chief
Commissioner.
4.
The above instructions may please be followed strictly in future.
|
|
|