Valuation of goods manufactured on job-work
Circular No. 619 dated 19th February 2002
I am directed to say that a number of
representations have been received from the trade as well as the Commissioners
on the method of valuation of goods manufactured on job-work basis after the
introduction of the new valuation provisions w.e.f. 1.7.2000.
2. The matter has been
examined by the Board. It is observed that the system of getting goods
manufactured on job-work basis is not new. Under the provisions of the earlier
section 4 and the Rules made thereunder the matter has been finally decided by
the Apex Court in the case of Ujagar Prints Ltd [1989 (039) ELT0493 (SC)] and
the case of Pawan Biscuits Co. Pvt Ltd [2000 (120) ELT0024 (SC)]. It was clearly
held that in respect of goods manufactured on job-work basis, assessable value
would be the job charges (including the profit of the job-worker if not already
included in the job-charges) plus the cost of the materials used in the
manufacture of the item (including the cost of the materials supplied free of
cost to the job-worker). The assessable value in such cases will not include the
profit or the expenses (like advertisement and publicity, overheads etc)
incurred by the buyer (or the supplier of the raw materials), where the dealing
between the two are on principal to principal basis. The mere fact that the
buyer is supplying some raw materials free of cost to the job-worker will not be
sufficient ground to contend that the dealings between the two are not at arms
length. Goods manufactured on job-work were earlier assessed under the residuary
Rule 7 of the erstwhile valuation Rules of 1975 read with rule 6(b) read with
the Apex Court decisions referred to above.
3. Under the new valuation
provisions, introduced with effect from 1.7.2000, there is no departure from the
principles laid down by the Apex Court in the above two decisions, in respect of
goods manufactured on job-work basis. In other words goods manufactured on
job-work basis after 1.7.2000 will continue to be valued in the same manner as
they were being valued before 1.7.2000. In other words, after 1.7.2000, in
respect of goods manufactured on job-work basis, valuation would be governed by
Rule 11 of the new valuation Rules of 2000 read with rule 6 read with the above
two decisions of the Apex Court.
4. As for example, problems
have been reported in the case of recorded CD (Compact Disc) manufactured on
job-work basis. The practice in most cases in the CD industry is that a music or
a film company acquires the copyright of some songs or movie on payment of a
lump sum amount of royalty to the artiste/producer and sends the master copy of
the musical score or movie either in the form of a digital audio tape (DAT) or a
cinematograph reel or a CD to a job-worker for making CDs on payment of job
charges. The job worker is provided, in most cases, the inlay cards, jackets and
the jewel box (plastic cover) to pack the CDs and return the same to the
copyright owner. The copyright owner then sells the CDs in the wholesale market
through its dealers, distributors or consignment agents. The copyright is
perpetual in nature and the copyright owner can give repeat orders to the job
worker. Thus even if the cost of obtaining the copyright is known, problems
arise in apportioning this cost to the CDs manufactured on job work because it
is not possible to ascertain the number of CDs which would get manufactured over
a period of time (which may extend to even 20 or 30 years). Further, the
copyright acquired covers audio cassettes also.
5. The expenses incurred by
the copyright owner towards advertisements and overheads cannot be included in
the assessable value of the CDs since the job worker (manufacturer) has no
connection with these expenses and these costs are not incurred at the instance
or on behalf of the manufacturer (job-worker). Since the job-worker receives
some items free of cost from the copyright owner, price is not the sole
consideration for the transaction between the copyright owner and the
job-worker. Therefore, resort will have to be taken to the Central Excise
Valuation Rules. No specific rule covers such a contingency. Resort will
therefore have to be taken to rule 11 of the valuation rules read with rule 6,
read with the Apex Court decisions cited above. The money value of the
additional consideration will have to be added to the job-charges. The cost
elements, which have to be included, are the cost of the items supplied free by
the music company to the job worker, namely inlay cards, jackets, jewel boxes
and the DAT/ disc.
6. The DAT/ discs contain
the original recorded music/ movie. Its cost would include the royalty amount
paid/ payable by the music company for acquiring exclusive rights for the music/
movie and the cost incurred in getting the original score recorded in a studio
(if this has been incurred by the copyright owner). In such cases the most
reasonable method would be to ascertain the royalty amount and studio hire
charges contained in the wholesale price of the CDs at which the copy right
owner sells, to its dealers, at arms length. This could be done by determining
the royalty amount plus the studio hire charges as a percentage of the net sale
value (gross sale minus central excise duty element) of the music company or
copyright owner in respect of the recorded media. In case the company also sells
audio cassettes of the same music, there would be no need to break up the sale
value for CD�s and cassettes separately for determining the percentage since
the royalty amount would cover rights for both. The figures of net sales and
royalty payments are normally available in the balance sheets of these
companies. This percentage will be used to determine the element of royalty cost
attributable to each CD. Duty will have to be paid by the job-worker on the
royalty amount also. As an illustration, if the ratio of the royalty amount plus
studio hire charges, to net sales of a music company is, say, 9.41% and the
whole sale price of a recorded CD of the music company is, say, Rs 100/- and the
job-charges charged by the job-worker is Rs 25/-, then the value on which duty
will have to be paid by the job-worker would be Rs 25 + 9.41% of Rs 100 = Rs 25
+ Rs 9.41= Rs 34.41. In case the music company has also supplied to the job
worker, free of cost, inlay cards, jackets, jewel box or any other
material/input, their cost should also be added to the job-charges. If the job
worker has purchased some raw materials (e.g. poly carbonate) or inputs, their
value will also be added.
7. For this it will be
necessary for the music company to supply to the job-worker the data relating to
royalty payment and the wholesale price of each CD, the cost of the inlay cards,
jacket, jewel box and other material supplied free of cost. Since net sales
value and total royalty payment for the current year will not be available with
the music company, duty should be determined on the basis of figures for the
previous year. Till the figures for the previous year are provided assessments
should be done provisionally. Assessments should be finalized immediately after
the figures for the previous year are made available.
8. Care should be taken to
ascertain the correct amount of expenditure involved in a year on royalty/
copyright. Some companies capitalize part of this amount and the expenditure may
also be reflected under the head "assets". In that case depreciation
taken/ shown during the relevant year under this head would be added to the
expenditure incurred on royalty/ copyright during the said year. Some companies
sell part of their acquired copyrights to other companies and the income on this
may be shown under the head license fees. In that case total expenditure on
royalty/ copyright during a year would be the gross amount spent under this head
in a year minus the amount received for sale of part of the rights during the
same year.
9.
Pending cases on valuation of goods manufactured on job-work basis may be
decided on the basis of these instructions.
10. Suitable
Trade notices may be issued for the information of the Trade
11. Hindi
version will follow
12. Receipt
of these instructions may be acknowledged.
|